Author Topic: Stop 'n go rule  (Read 2269 times)

Fredde Cederberg

  • Global Moderator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63
    • Modell Marin
Stop 'n go rule
« on: March 10, 2009, 07:38:47 pm »
I think this new rule is one of the worst rules ever, it's dangerous when you get called stop 'n go to bring up the boat on the pontoon, accident can happen easily when the driver is frustrated over the judge call. It would be better to use the rules and do more penalty by taking away laps.

Leon Morgan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • Team LMRacing
Re: Stop 'n go rule
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2009, 09:55:44 pm »
Totally agree with you Fredde.

After each WC meeting i hear new crazy rules and wonder if the people voting for them actually race with us?!

I think more new judges would be great to help spread the load on the existing judges, then as you say "It would be better to use the rules and do more penalty by taking away laps"  they can concentrate on judging and letting the competitors race.
Regards,

Leon

www.LMRacing.co.uk

Bart Drieghe

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Stop 'n go rule
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2009, 09:33:46 pm »
The rule has been voted during the WC in Leno , i'm a bit surprised that only the "few" competitors at the WC vote on it but i can understand why .

What i don't get on the stop and go penalty is this , how long do you "stop" .
After some testing , i'm sure you can make the stop and go penalty within a few seconds .
Boat coming to the pontoon , shutting the engine off at the last meters , copilot takes the boat , belt ready , start and go .
I wonder what effect it will have on the pilot ( and his steering )

So question , is there a idon'tknowhowlongbut a real stop ? Like 6 seconds ? or 10 ?

Byessss ,
B

Leon Morgan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • Team LMRacing
Re: Stop 'n go rule
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2009, 10:15:26 pm »
Hi Bart, i don't quite understand your last question but i believe the stop go rule is a 10sec stop. I am sure someone will correct me in due course if this is incorrect..
Again this rule will have to be "policed" by judges stopping them from concentrating on the most important thing, the race. Lap penalties is a better way i believe.
Regards,

Leon

www.LMRacing.co.uk

Bart Drieghe

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Stop 'n go rule
« Reply #4 on: March 13, 2009, 08:44:24 am »
Hi Leon ,

What i meant is this :

This is a text from the NAVIGA minutes of Leno
NOwhere in the text are they saying how long the stop is so i'm wondering , is there a time that you have to stop ???

The current safety rule is issuing a yellow card for breaches of safety rules. This does not seem to be working very well because there are problems with recording who was given yellow card in one heat and carried it thorough to the next. It creates additional administration for the judges.

Peter Schaft has put forward a proposal that the yellow safety card is replaced with “ stop and go “ penalty. This would mean that if a judge has issued a competitor with a stop and go penalty they would have to bring the boat back to the pontoon, turn off the engine and start again to continue the race.

Stop and go penalty would be given for the following situations:
FSR –V - passing the rescue boat or the pontoon too close and too fast
FSR – O – passing the pontoon too close too fast
FSR – H – passing the pontoon too close too fast will mean an extra lap to complete the race.

Ian Folkson, clarified the problem in noting the yellow card because it is meant to be carried over from 1st heat into the next. Alternative “stop go” penalty is immediate, does not carry over to next heat. It will make the race safer, yellow card / safety card is not being noted by competitors.

France already uses this system.

Steve Whenham suggested we need to also decide how many stop and go penalties will you be allowed in one heat? Otherwise you can continue to drive recklessly to make up the missed time.

Australia was concerned about how does the judge measure the distance from pontoon or the rescue boat. Ian Folkson responded that judge needs to be consistent not necessarily accurate.

France confirms it is a good system. It gives you an opportunity to calm down, discuss with judge etc.

Luxemburg – safety for people in the rescue is most important the safety measures in place are not making it safer for them.

Ian Folkson suggest that maybe if you have 2 stop and go penalties in the heat you should be out of that heat.

Sweden – in respect of offshore racing even just 1 stop and go penalty will mean that you are out of the race, you will not qualify.

Steve Whenham was concerned that whilst we all know about danger of the rescue boat and pits has anyone thought about the fact that the judge is not watching the race whilst he is issuing a penalty and they should each be given a runner to deliver the decision to competitor .

USA – If you have 3 extra penalty laps you are out of the race. It does not matter how this is done but the judges should be consistent. Why not just keep it a penalty lap system and you remove the competitor after predetermined number of penalties. USA were concerned that you are creating other safety problems in the process of removing boat from the water and re-launching the boat because of stop go penalty.

Ezio Casini pointed out that the life of the people in rescue boat is more important than the competitors race.

Germany believe that in FSR-O one lap deduction is better than stop go penalty. For FSR-V v it would be applicable but for O it may be difficult.

France there should be a time on stop go penalty. Competitor should be given time to think because you need to calm down before they are re-launching the boat.

Some further discussion took place regarding within how many laps should the boat be brought in and that stop and go penalty cannot be appealed because it is immediate. The safety card could be formally appealed at the end.

Discussion was closed and revised proposal was put forward for the vote:

H – extra lap for safety rule breach, when 3rd penalty has been issued competitor will be told to bring the boat in and take no further part in that heat.
O – lap deducted for safety rule breach, when 3rd penalty has been issued competitor will be told to bring the boat in and take no further part in that heat.
V – stop and go penalty applies for safety rule breaches. Once competitor has been informed by the judge that they have received a stop and go penalty they will have to immediately bring the boat back to the pontoon, put it on the stand, stop the engine, restart and resume the competition. When the 3rd stop and go penalty has been issued to the same competitor they will be told to bring the boat in and take no further part in that heat.

Above revised proposal was put forward by Ian Folkson and seconded by USA.

Voting takes place

Everyone present agreed to the rule change as above.




As you can see in the last part  "they will have to immediately bring the boat back to the pontoon, put it on the stand, stop the engine, restart and resume the competition" , there is no mentioning of time ............

Thats what i'm asking : how long will you have to stop ( meaning , boat on the stand and not touching it )

Btw , i think thats a crap rule in the first place . Then again , i haven't had many yellow or red cards so i might have some benefit on it lol .

B

Fredde Cederberg

  • Global Moderator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63
    • Modell Marin
Re: Stop 'n go rule
« Reply #5 on: March 13, 2009, 12:36:41 pm »
If you look at the stop ´n go on car racing, the engine is never stopped. I think it will be hazardous to use this rule and like France do "disscus with the judge" seems really strange, the judges has to be observant on the race all the time.

I think I am faster to restart my engine after a stop 'n go then what it takes to run a full lap.

One rule that we don't have wich I think should be is "Blue flag", it should not be allowed to not let faster boats by(if the faster boat is ahead in the heat, when battling for position is different)

w3bby

  • Team Sweden
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
    • Exposure AB
Re: Stop 'n go rule
« Reply #6 on: March 14, 2009, 12:20:22 pm »

V – stop and go penalty applies for safety rule breaches. Once competitor has been informed by the judge that they have received a stop and go penalty they will have to immediately bring the boat back to the pontoon, put it on the stand, stop the engine, restart and resume the competition. When the 3rd stop and go penalty has been issued to the same competitor they will be told to bring the boat in and take no further part in that heat.

I don't race V but help with the running of the V class in Sweden. Here's my take on the new rule, nitpicking maybe but here goes.

1. What is "immediately", does the competitor cut the course or do they come in on completion of the lap they received the penalty? This should be better defined.

2. As written the boat must be taken out of the water with the engine running and then stopped on the stand. With the pressure of racing this is going to have an adverse affect on safety as stated by USA. If anything the rule should read "Back to the pontoon, stop engine, remove from the water, place on the stand, restart and resume the race"

3. The judge is going to have to stand over the competitor to ensure the motor is stopped. Last thing a competitor needs in this stress situation is someone hanging over their shoulder.

4. What is happening on the course during this time? The judge should be watching the race not a "stop'n'go" as stated by Steve Whenham.

5. What looks good on paper does not necessarily work well in practice, how do you appeal a "stop'n'go"? This rule opens up for huge problems with accusations of favouritism, feelings of anger and frustration on the dock (just look at F1 for a parallel) and I'm sure you can think of others. This is not the mind set we want in a competitive racing environment.

The yellow card system worked, if people had trouble administering it then refine the rule. A big yellow sticker with a P on the boat for instance, applied at the end of a heat. Too many penalties during a heat and you are out anyway so no need to do anything just remove the competitor from their next heat.

From the racing in Sweden I would tend to agree with Fredde's "Blue Flag", a competitor in a lapping position should not have to fight tooth and nail to get past a back marker.
------------------------------------

Ian Webster
Skånes Modellbåts Sällskap

Sune Persson

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • Member of ERCK - Eksjö RC Club SE
Re: Stop 'n go rule
« Reply #7 on: March 14, 2009, 07:40:24 pm »

V – stop and go penalty applies for safety rule breaches. Once competitor has been informed by the judge that they have received a stop and go penalty they will have to immediately bring the boat back to the pontoon, put it on the stand, stop the engine, restart and resume the competition. When the 3rd stop and go penalty has been issued to the same competitor they will be told to bring the boat in and take no further part in that heat.

I don't race V but help with the running of the V class in Sweden. Here's my take on the new rule, nitpicking maybe but here goes.

1. What is "immediately", does the competitor cut the course or do they come in on completion of the lap they received the penalty? This should be better defined.

2. As written the boat must be taken out of the water with the engine running and then stopped on the stand. With the pressure of racing this is going to have an adverse affect on safety as stated by USA. If anything the rule should read "Back to the pontoon, stop engine, remove from the water, place on the stand, restart and resume the race"

3. The judge is going to have to stand over the competitor to ensure the motor is stopped. Last thing a competitor needs in this stress situation is someone hanging over their shoulder.

4. What is happening on the course during this time? The judge should be watching the race not a "stop'n'go" as stated by Steve Whenham.

5. What looks good on paper does not necessarily work well in practice, how do you appeal a "stop'n'go"? This rule opens up for huge problems with accusations of favouritism, feelings of anger and frustration on the dock (just look at F1 for a parallel) and I'm sure you can think of others. This is not the mind set we want in a competitive racing environment.

The yellow card system worked, if people had trouble administering it then refine the rule. A big yellow sticker with a P on the boat for instance, applied at the end of a heat. Too many penalties during a heat and you are out anyway so no need to do anything just remove the competitor from their next heat.

From the racing in Sweden I would tend to agree with Fredde's "Blue Flag", a competitor in a lapping position should not have to fight tooth and nail to get past a back marker.

I do agree with Ian, and Freddie. This rule is one of the most ridicoules rules created in this sport i think.
What´s going to happend within all stress, and close to the bridge in such situation, is not hard to understand.
So, the blue flag should probably be the best, and a more secure way to put penelty to a competitor in this case I think?
« Last Edit: March 16, 2009, 10:44:53 am by Sune Persson »

Leon Morgan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • Team LMRacing
Re: Stop 'n go rule
« Reply #8 on: March 14, 2009, 09:48:21 pm »
Bart, thanks for that useful info. Very vague as always

The Blue flag is another completely different issue/rule originally mentioned by Fredde - "One rule that we don't have wich I think should be is "Blue flag"."
It is only used when lapping other racers. Not a method for penalising dangerous driving, driving too close to rescue etc so lets leave that for another topic

"The yellow card system worked, if people had trouble administering it then refine the rule." - A very good point! I think this is the direction we want to be thinking. Just wish i had the perfect idea as i think the stop n go is more dangerous   ???
Regards,

Leon

www.LMRacing.co.uk

w3bby

  • Team Sweden
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
    • Exposure AB
Re: Stop 'n go rule
« Reply #9 on: May 01, 2009, 05:18:08 pm »
The rule was successfully applied in Stuttgart I have been told..... Exactly how I still do not know.
A clarification has been given on the "immediate" return to the dock and that is at the end of the lap on which the stop and go is given.
I am still concerned about the written rule that the boat must be stopped on the stand. This literally means that the engine must be running when the boat is taken out of the water and placed on the stand. Therefore if the competitor stops the engine, intentionally or accidentally, on the water it must be restarted, then stopped on the stand and then restarted and reentered in the race.
If we are really concerned about safety breaches around the retrieve boat maybe we should have a " RC safety boat", BIG RED and SLOW. When the retrieve boat goes out the safety boat goes out as well and all racers have to line up behind it, no overtaking etc. When the retrieve boat is back in then in comes the safety boat and the race resumes...... let's get as much like F1 as we can..... ;D ::)
------------------------------------

Ian Webster
Skånes Modellbåts Sällskap

Sune Persson

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • Member of ERCK - Eksjö RC Club SE
Re: Stop 'n go rule
« Reply #10 on: May 28, 2009, 07:08:41 pm »
Hey hooo!
This looks like a complicated function. HEHE - with a safety-boat, it should be pretty slow action in a competition I guess? And it will certainly take a lot more time to make a race too?

Really - I think the roule of "Stop and go" still is a crazy ideá, hwo can it be, introducing such stupid
rule?